BABY CASPIAN KIDNAPPED IN NORWAY…UPDATE #7

Caspian and Nadia June 2016

Caspian and Nadia
June 2016


It is almost a week since an update appeared here. There are a few events worth noting that have happened since then.

Nadia was allowed to see Caspian last Thursday and Friday.

According to an accurate source, Nadia thought that the visitations went very well. Caspian remembered Nadia on the first visit. Nadia was concerned before the visit that Caspian might not remember her very well.

Nadia has also been given visitations for every Thursday and Friday until her next court hearing.

A new date has been added to Nadia’s court schedule.

Nadia’s lawyer has sent her a text message. Apparently, a court hearing at an undisclosed location will be held on the 8th of August. This hearing will determine whether or not Caspian will be allowed to go home with Nadia until the permanent care order case is heard on August 25th.

The August 25th hearing will be heard in Bergen.

—————————

My thoughts:

Tomorrow, it will be a month since Caspian was kidnapped from his mother by the organization that is responsible for the proper care of abused children in Norway.

There has been no abuse of this child in this case. This is why the term “kidnapping” fits the situation in its current condition.

I have looked up the word “kidnap” in the dictionary. Here is a general definition that seems to summarize definitions of the word that I have read from dictionaries, Federal law, and International law.

“In criminal law, kidnapping is the unlawful taking away or transportation of a person against that person’s will, usually to hold the person unlawfully. This may be done for ransom or in furtherance of another crime, or in connection with a child custody dispute.”

In this case, Caspian’s legal guardian, Nadia, did not wish for her child to be taken. As there is no valid reason yet given for Caspian to be taken away from his mother, Caspian has been kidnapped.

Caspian has not yet been “stolen” from his mother as this would have to be the new term used if Nadia’s child is taken away permanently.
If Nadia has done anything wrong, maybe a reprimand of some type or counseling sessions might be necessary. However,

ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION OF “KIDNAP” ABOVE, IT IS A CRIMINAL ACT TO “TAKE AWAY” CASPIAN FROM NADIA FOR THE REASONS GIVEN IN THIS CASE.

Also, note that this publication is not aware of any public statement made on this case by the Barnevernet, the organization responsible for this kidnapping which happened almost a month ago.

In a democracy, one is innocent until proven guilty. If this case had any merit, the penalty would be far less in any civilized society.

So…Nadia waits until Thursday to see Caspian. She will then have to wait until August 8th to find out if Caspian can stay with her until the important court hearing on August 25th. It seems that the August 25th hearing will determine Caspian’s future.

Please pray for Nadia and Caspian.

Chris Reimers

Advertisements

8 Responses to BABY CASPIAN KIDNAPPED IN NORWAY…UPDATE #7

  1. SLIMJIM says:

    Praying for God’s divine favor on August 25th!

  2. Gabriela Presthus says:

    Chris – opisz sprawe pani GEORGIA TANN
    To jest wazna sprawa.porowhaj z BV.

    • Chris says:

      Gabriela,

      As you act like you understand English enough to make a comment, I will ask you, as I have before, to translate your comments into English. If they make sense, whether they agree with me or not, they will not be erased. If they make no sense like this comment, when put through Google Translate, there is no reason to include your comments in the discussion.

      Please translate your comments into understandable English or they will be deleted. Your comments don’t have to be perfect but they have to be better than the one you just sent. Here is the Google translation of what you sent and it cannot be understood:

      “Chris – describe your affair GEORGIA TANN
      It is important sprawa.porowhaj of BV”

  3. Gabriela Presthus says:

    Jezeli nie znasz tej historii to znaczy , ze niewiele wiesz o historii Bv w Ameryce.

    WIKIPEDIA :GEORGIA TANN

    • Chris says:

      “If you do not know this story is to say that do not know much about the history Bv in America.
      WIKIPEDIA : GEORGIA TANN”

      You finally made a statement that seems to make sense, Gabriela.

      If your words are literal, you are saying that I’m not educated about America’s BV (our CPS or DHS) because I was not aware of one case.

      I will admit to not knowing all of American history including American CPS history. I also admit to living in America for my entire life and to having at least average intelligence and knowledge.

      Even if the case of Georgia Tann is true (I’m sure some variation is true as there are sources on the internet), you are mixing apples with oranges.

      Georgia Tann did not represent an entire country like the Barnevernet does. Every country has evil people who hide in the shadows.

      I guess I don’t understand your point. It would be like saying I don’t know about the one baby who died in foster care in my county this year. Because I can’t find many facts in the case except for a name and an obituary at a funeral home, I have no other details. Who was responsible for this death or the deaths and stolen babies in the Georgia Tann case? I don’t think we will ever know unless we know all of the facts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: