BABY CASPIAN KIDNAPPED IN NORWAY…UPDATE #4

June 24, 2016
Caspian
Caspian


Nadia’s lawyer thought that a decision would be made in his client’s case today.

He and Nadia waited for a phone call or a text message.

None came.

Nadia received a text message from her lawyer at approximately 4:50 pm this afternoon. It read:

“I have not heard anything and they are closed. This means that they will not decide until Monday.”

Nadia, Caspian’s mother, has been told that her son is in Bergen, a 7-8 hour trip away by car. Nadia has been informed that Caspian is at an undisclosed address because the Barnevernet doesn’t want her to know of his location. This is because they think that Nadia might try to kidnap Caspian. It is the reason they will not let Nadia know where Caspian is.

The Wings of the Wind has been told by a good source that yesterday’s hearing was held in Molde, about a 1 and 1/2 hour drive from where Nadia now lives.

This publication has also learned more about the hearing in Molde.

First, only one person presided over the hearing.

Second, Brynhild Solvang, the head of the CPS office in Volda, the office where the decision to take Caspian from his mother was made, was present with a Barnevernet lawyer.

Third, Nadia and her Lawyer were present to answer questions and give testimony.

Fourth, Margaret Hennum was allowed to give witness testimony.

Fifth, Nadia’s lawyer expected a decision today.

Nadia’s lawyer waited today for an answer and was not contacted by the Molde office.

Nadia received the text message from her lawyer noted above.

—————
Editor’s notes:

The last two days of this hearing bring up more questions than they answer.

Why was Nadia’s lawyer not notified that there would be no ruling until next week?

Why is Caspian so far away from his mother in Bergen?

Why did the Barnevernet think that Nadia would kidnap her child? She has never attempted anything like it in the past.

Why was only one person presiding over the hearing at the Fylkesnemnda?

As noted in yesterday’s update:

“The Tribunal consists of a lawyer, two experts members and two unknown members.”

This information was mentioned in the link from the Fylkesnemnda, posted here yesterday in Update #3.

Why was Margaret Hennum allowed to give witness testimony?

The Wings of the Wind has been informed that this is very unusual in a case like this.

I have another question based on new information that I have been given from a reliable source.

My question: Even if Nadia is given custody of Caspian on Monday, why does she have to go to another hearing to determine Caspian’s future?

I have been told that the decision of this County Council for Child Welfare and Social Affairs is only a temporary one.

Nadia has been informed that there will be another hearing in late August to determine Caspian’s welfare.

All of these questions create a big one:

Is this how all child welfare cases are handled in Norway?

If so, I can’t imagine a loving parent experiencing something like this.

Added to these tragic events is the story of Nadia’s upbringing.

She was taken from a mother whom she considered “loving” when she was only 13. She and four siblings, including twins, were split up into five different places and were raised in five different environments.

She has already experienced tragedy. Now, it is happening again.

Only this time it involves her only child: Caspian.

If the CPS of Norway (The Barnevernet) was very concerned for Caspian or his mother, this case wouldn’t be handled in such a cold and heartless manner.

The term “kidnap” usually means that someone is taken against his/her will.

The kidnappers here work for Norway’s Barnevernet.

The kidnapper is not Nadia.

She is the loving mother of Caspian.

Chris Reimers

I have spent some time looking for a picture of the Molde, Fylkenemnda, or even a map showing it’s location. I was unable to find either. If you happen to stumble upon one or the other, please place a link in the comment section below.

Thank you.